BRIC AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Can the world’s largest
emerging markets convert their growing economic power into greater geopolitical
clout?
The fact that the
world’s largest emerging markets (the so-called BRIC: Brazil, Russia, India,
and China) will alter the global financial landscape in the coming decades has
become a substantive argument and gained ground in the investment community.
However, at what extent can the BRICs convert their growing economic power into
greater geopolitical clout, presenting
a strong geopolitical influence and reshaping the world affairs?
While the global
recession is expected to delay for much of this year and next in the U.S.,
Japan and Western Europe; BRIC’s economic scenario is not so alarming. Although
Russia was severely caught in the financial storm, economic output in China,
India and Brazil continue to grow and finances are sound, supported by prudent
policies, large foreign currency reserves and growing domestic markets. BRIC’s
economic growth rate has slow down due to weaken demand from matures’ markets, but
it is offset by affluent domestic markets and increasing trade cooperation
among emerging economies. According
to the World Bank, developing countries’ share in world trade rose from 16% in
1990 to 30% in 2006, led by China and with Brazil and India not far behind. The
World Bank also projects further increases in developing countries’ share in
world trade to 45% by 2030. Unlike past global crises, this
crisis differs in a way that it started in the Western economies and that
emerging markets are in a much stronger position due to accumulation of foreign
reserves, large domestic markets and increasing trade cooperation.
Despite the fact
that the four BRIC nations have been seeking to form a political club, none of
them has gained influence in the leadership structure of the IMF or World Bank.
And although Russia is part of the G-8, it is under severe pressure to be
kicked out as it political and economic situation worsens. To be able to convert their growing economic power
into greater geopolitical clout, the BRIC nations need to overcome internal
conflicts and align their political interests.
The link among
the BRIC countries has always been weak. Although they are all populous
countries with emerging market economies, the BRICs have huge differences in
their industrial bases, political systems and overall progress. China and India
are manufacturing based economies and big importers, while Brazil and Russia
are large exporters of natural resources. Brazil and India are liberal
democracies, while Russia is a limited democracy and China is a one-party
state.
Domestic problems
and regional conflicts may also prevent BRICs from gaining global political
influence. The four BRIC nations need to strength their rule of law and root
out corruption if they were to become dominant forces in the global political
stage. Moreover, China's and Russia's disregard for human rights and democracy
could be a problem in the future, as is the possibility of conflict over Taiwan
in the case of China. India's border conflicts with Bangladesh and dispute with
Pakistan over Kashmir can restraint India’s political power in the region as
well.
Besides their
problems and issues, the BRICs have become major players on the world scene.
Brazil is energy self-sufficient, one of the world's foremost producers of
alternative fuels and a powerful voice in global-trade talks. Although Russia
does not have a particular economic strength, it is a strategic energy exporter
and military power. India has the world's fastest-expanding work force and has
become a very important technological center. It is also very active in energy
diplomacy, exploring oil and gas in Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa.
Finally, China, as the world's fastest-growing economy, has gained considerable
political strength and defies international conventions on currency,
copyrights, Darfur, and Tibet.
The U.S. foreign
policy should not underestimate BRICs’ potential to project their power in the
world. BRIC nations are starting
to set the agenda in their own neighborhoods, and they are also conducting
global diplomacy very confidently. The U.S. foreign policy should aim to
restore trust and confidence in America’s standing and leadership in the world
by strategic and cooperative partnership with BRIC nations in order to redesign
a new world-order. World policy-making forums should be reorganized and the G-7
should be adjusted to incorporated BRIC’s representatives.
In a world shaken
by global recession and with the decline of U.S. hegemony, the BRIC nations
have the economic power and international ambitions to conquer geopolitical
clout. Although the U.S. will regain some degree of influence, the global
balance of power is changing rapidly to a multi-polar order. The major factors
that may prevent BRIC from strengthen its political influence lie in the group
internal differences and political divergences. If the BRIC nations can
overcome these differences and see their interests aligned, they can become a
coherent and powerful organization with political clout to change the world
order.
Carolina Freire - April, 2009
This report may be forwarded or republished on your website with
attribution to www.briccenter.com.
Copyright 2009 BRIC CENTER.
